Tuesday, May 24, 2022
HomeSportsPro Wrestling Is Unique, So Stop Comparing It to MMA

Pro Wrestling Is Unique, So Stop Comparing It to MMA

Brock Lesnar WWE There are a few people out there who will contend to the death that pro wrestling and mixed martial arts are the same exact thing competing for the same exact market vying for the same exact fans. Some of those people have websites and newsletters that cover both as if they’re the same thing.

This blog covers both, but I think E does a good job distinguishing between the two. But yeah, there are other sites, very respected sites that actually do good work that have people writing for them that feel Triple H vs. Undertaker can be objectively judged against Rampage Jackson vs. Jon “Bones” Jones.

[adinserter block=”2″]Those people are, pardon my French, full of sh*t.

The biggest reason why wrestling and MMA are not the same is that the former is staged and the latter isn’t. It would be like judging Game 6 of this year’s World Series against the pivotal final game from Major League. Yeah, there was a baseball-like substance being pawned off in the movie. The point, though, wasn’t to see who’d win that “game” between the Indians and Yankees but to serve as the final act in a story that had unfolded over the rest of the film. The game mechanics being hyper-realistic or not didn’t have a whole lot of bearing on the effectiveness of the story.

It’s because of that kind of poetic license that wrestling is the free form thing it is today. It literally is whatever the people in charge want it to be, whatever the people in the ring want it to be. It’s in that freedom to create where the beauty of this thing we’ve been watching for at least some portion of our lives lies. It honestly doesn’t matter what is put on the screen or live in the ring for us, as long as it’s entertaining and executed well. There are no hard and fast rules to follow.

Yet, there are people out there who want wrestling to be MORE like MMA. I wonder what their motivations are for something like that, because MMA is a sport and sports have rules. They have structure. For fans of it, there’s beauty within that structure, but it’s a structure that works only for MMA. To try and retrofit pro wrestling into that box would be to destroy its appeal. I get the feeling that people who think in this way only want to like wrestling when it’s cool, and are trying to get it to latch onto something that is so meteorically popular right now that it would have to be cool by osmosis. I feel like their intentions are misguided.

One reason why wrestling right now isn’t doing business enough for some of these insecure, closeted fans to come out of their shells is that companies in the mainstream are trying too hard to imitate something else. In this case, especially for Impact Wrestling, the template is the business 15 years or so ago. People don’t want to see transparent imitations. It’s true that not much is wholly original anymore, but usually, what does work is a fresh take on an existing idea or archetype. Fresh takes are still innovative.

The question would then be what could pro wrestling as an industry do to provide a fresh take as to what MMA could do? I’m straining to find that answer. The appeal of promotions like UFC is that what they put on is real competition. It’s sport, men (or women) beating the crap out of other men (or women). There’s nothing in wrestling that could enhance that get-up without detracting from the legitimacy that gives the sport its appeal. None at all. The existing fans of MMA would look at it as a cheap, fake knockoff, and the existing fans of wrestling who don’t really dig MMA or like wrestling for different reasons than they like MMA will shy away from it because what makes wrestling unique is being stripped away.

[adinserter block=”1″]That uniqueness is what makes wrestling great. For as popular as MMA is right now, that popularity can’t be transferred over to pro wrestling just through osmosis. Besides, if one really likes pro wrestling, who cares if it’s popular? Widespread appeal or great business numbers are not worth sacrificing artistic integrity. Wrestling promoters should heed that more than anyone, but the fans and journalists who keep comparing the two with such closeness should do the same too.

Appreciate what makes wrestling special. Don’t throw it away just because shoot fighting is more popular.

Tom Holzerman is a lifelong wrestling fan and connoisseur of all things Chikara Pro, among other feds. When he’s not writing for the Camel Clutch Blog, you can find him on his own blog, The Wrestling Blog.

WWE: Greatest Rivalries – Shawn Michaels vs.. Bret Hart

CM Punk Best in the World Authentic T-Shirt

CM Punk Ice Cream Bar T-Shirt

Grab discounted WWE DVDs, merchandise, t -shirts, figures, and more from Amazon.com

Tom Holzerman is a lifelong wrestling fan and connoisseur of all things Chikara Pro, among other feds. When he’s not writing for the Camel Clutch Blog, you can find him on his own blog, The Wrestling Blog.


  1. The history of the two types of entertainment is much different and thus they are not the same. But, what the article misses is that they are now competing for much the same crowd. You may not think so, but they do. Yes, they are different and appeal to different crowds but as it goes, those crowds are shrinking. Pro wrestling has seen its better years. I see that prices and availability at the Pond in Anaheim have gone DOWN…why? No demand. Yet they sell out UFCs much in advance. People won't do both, especially given the economy. And Vince's PPVs are declining probably due to too many of them. The product isn't unique.

    What uniqueness? Really, running Hogan and Flair, or the Miz? Please. There is none, repeated story lines ad nauseum.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Popular