Friday, July 1, 2022
HomeWWE | Pro WrestlingIn Defense Of TNA's Roode Vs. Storm Booking

In Defense Of TNA’s Roode Vs. Storm Booking

Bobby RoodeOne week ago TNA Wrestling was criticized for not putting Bobby Roode over for the TNA championship. A week later that has changed and guess what? Those same critics are still complaining. Can this company win with anyone in 2011?

The Internet Wrestling Community buzzed all of last week with TNA Wrestling’s decision not to put Bobby Roode over for the title at Bound for Glory. A year of build ended with Roode staring aimlessly into the crowd as Kurt Angle limped to the locker room after pulling off the upset. Less than two weeks later, a lot has changed.

Be warned. The following will contain major TNA Impact Wrestling spoilers. Stop reading now if you don’t want to read spoilers. Okay, you have been warned.

[adinserter block=”2″]As most of you know by now, Roode was reportedly scheduled to win the title at Bound for Glory. According to dozens of reports, Hulk Hogan called an audible and changed his mind the day of the show. Hogan and Bischoff are running the show right now and according to many, Hulk felt Roode wasn’t ready. These reports incensed fans and even some of the wrestlers in TNA.

TNA Wrestling then taped episodes of Impact over the last week and half. A lot has changed and the booking is very reminiscent of how the WWE would handle their post WrestleMania booking, by introducing new storylines and character changes. So it should be no surprise that the TNA bookers have given the company something of a reboot following their biggest show of the year, Bound for Glory 2011.

It all started the night after Bound for Glory when James Storm shocked the world and defeated Kurt Angle in a minute to win the TNA championship. Fans were caught between confusion and anger at seeing anyone but Bobby Roode get the strap. I certainly saw Hogan’s argument about Roode but to tell people that Roode isn’t ready and Storm is, well that is where you lose me. Once news broke of the title change I joined the camp of critics, although Hogan told the critics to wait and see how it played out.

The criticism got louder when TNA began promoting a match between Storm and Roode for the title on free television. Fans and bloggers felt that TNA was rushing an angle that could have played out for the next year (as it did in Ring of Honor). The decision to put the match on free television as opposed to pay per view was not questioned, it was declared foolish by most. I’ll get to that in a moment.

TNA taped the match Wednesday night in Macon, Georgia to air on Impact Wrestling. It didn’t take long for the news to break after Bobby Roode defeated James Storm for the championship. According to reports, Roode broke a beer bottle over Storm’s head to win the title, and thus turn heel. Roode later attacked James Storm so viciously, that Storm may sit out all the way through TNA Lockdown to sell the injuries. The night of Impact tapings ended with Roode leaving town with the title and heading to Turning Point to defend the title against AJ Styles.

That all sounds great right? Nope, well not according to the TNA haters (and count me in, I am not a fan of the product). Social media was ablaze in TNA hate and criticism as well as many noted bloggers and journalists. Dave Meltzer and Bryan Alvarez ripped the booking apart on their F4Wonline.com podcast. I sat there listening to it and at that point something strange happened. I started seeing the other side, the dark side, yes I started to see it through TNA Wrestling’s eyes and I came to the conclusion that not only is this company not getting a fair shake, the angle totally makes sense!

First of all, let’s start with the Roode heel turn. Why would they turn him after building up as a big babyface over the last year? For one, everyone seems to forget that Kurt Angle is badly hurt. There is a spot open for a top heel that needs to be filled. Without Angle around, who was the company’s top heel? Jeff Jarrett, Eric Bischoff, Scott Steiner, Ken Anderson? Could you imagine the scathing criticism TNA would get if Jeff Jarrett wound up with the title? Why not Bobby Roode?

Check out the full Camel Clutch Blog Pro Wrestling and MMA store for videos, t-shirts, books, and more.

A big criticism of the turn is that TNA spent all of this time pushing Roode as a babyface, showing video of his family, etc. Hello, what better timing to turn him heel than after a year of building him up as a sympathetic babyface? What value would there be turning Roode a year from now? By then he’d be watered down and wind up squashed back to the middle of the pack. He is hot, he is seen as a top guy, and the emotions are exactly where they should be. The timing is perfect!

Did TNA miss a business opportunity by putting this match on free television as opposed to pay per view? Have you seen the TNA buyrates? If you want eyes on the biggest angle in company history, than why would they put it on pay per view? If the end game here is to sell the grudge match when Storm returns, I look at this as a loss leader. They will make much more money on the grudge match than they would if they put their first match on Turning Point. TNA would be fooling themselves to think otherwise.

Did they rush the angle? Maybe they did, maybe they didn’t. Let’s face it. The big angle right now in TNA is Hulk Hogan vs. Eric Bischoff. Anything Roode and Storm would have started would be overshadowed by the big boys. Hogan and Bischoff will hopefully have ran its course by the time Storm comes back, thus they jump right into the top spot. Even if that isn’t the case, fans will have the emotional investment of seeing Storm come back for revenge no matter what Bischoff or Hogan are doing. I can see both sides, but I don’t think it is definitely right or wrong either way.

In the meantime, instead of getting the same old formula of Kurt Angle vs. Sting, Ken Anderson, or Jeff Jarrett for the TNA championship on the next pay per view, fans are getting AJ Styles vs. Bobby Roode. That has the potential to be the best pro wrestling match on pay per view period in November. At some point you will get Roode vs. Storm in the main-event spot. Could 2012 finally be the year that TNA main-events blow WWE headliners out of the water?

[adinserter block=”1″]Finally, this angle has me! I can’t remember the last time I have been excited or even inclined to tune into TNA Impact to see this thing play out. I love the freshness of Roode as heel champion on top, I love the dynamic of him vs. Storm, and this whole thing sounds a heck of a lot better than anything I have seen on Monday night recently. TNA, you got me!

I am not saying that you are wrong to hate this angle or criticize, but at least take an objective look before you start throwing bombs at the Impact Zone. I probably haven’t said this in six years (since Samoa Joe and Kurt Angle brawled in the Impact Zone), but I really like where TNA is going.

CM Punk Best in the World Authentic T-Shirt

CM Punk Ice Cream Bar T-Shirt

WWE Greatest Rivalries: Shawn Michaels Vs Bret Hart DVD

Great Deals at WWEShop.com!

Grab discounted WWE DVDs, merchandise, t -shirts, figures, and more from the WWE Shop on Amazon.com

RELATED ARTICLES

7 COMMENTS

  1. The "Ten Percenters", as Bischoff calls them, aren't complaining because the world title is on Roode or Storm. They aren't complaining because "TNA Originals" are in the main event scene (well, "lower main event", given how Hogan vs. Bischoff is the "real" main event…brother). They're complaining about the writing for this storyline and how it shows that TNA has no earthly idea how to grab people's attention outside of "shocking swerves".

    If TNA is more concerned with television ratings than they are wih pay-per-view buyrates, then why doesn't the company cancel their pay-per-view contract and start making three-hour commercial-free specials on Spike TV once every two months? This would not only give the company a direction to work towards; it would have a show that features proper blowoffs to feuds and rivalries, rather than ending them on PPVs that nobody watches or random episodes of Impact (where only the "Ten Percenters" who read the taping spoilers expect the feud/rivalry to end).

    I appreciate that you're trying to see the bright side of TNA. You honestly do make a compelling argument, and it would take far too much time for me to argue against every last argument that you make. Rather than rebut your entire column, I just want to ask you a single, simple question:

    Did you feel the least bit satisfied, as a wrestling fan, when Bobby Roode lost the TNA World Heavyweight Championship match at Bound For Glory?

  2. Eric, I couldn't agree with you more. In one move you now have a new heel at the top as well as new potential challengers. Just as long as they dont force Roode into some storyline with Immortal. And as far as the timing of building him up and then turnign him, I love it. Like you said, they are in need of a new top heel, and Roode fits that mold perfectly. I always liked him better as a heel anyway. This totally reminds me of 1998 in the WWE. The Rock was a top heel. They started to turn him face over the summer and then at Survivor Series…BOOM he turns heel again, wins the belt, and joins up with McMahon. And fans hated him twice as much for making them think he was good. I think this angle definelty has potential, if done properly.

  3. Having read your synopsis, I'm going to have to disagree with you.

    "If you want eyes on the biggest angle in company history, than why would they put it on pay per view?"

    This is exactly why TNA's PPV buyrates are in the toilet. Let me put this in a different light.

    Imagine that you're a booker and Hogan's like, "No way. Roode can't put the strap on as a face." So, Angle has to survive Roode and get squashed by Storm. I'll live with that. So next week, Roode has to challenge Joe for #1 contendership. Given Joe's losing streak, I don't see how that should be valid but I'm gonna let it slide. Then next week, you've got Storm and Roode for the title. And that's it. Suddenly Roode flips and turns heel on Storm to take the strap.

    But what if, instead, you got the bright idea to make Roode have to run a gauntlet to get his #1 contendership back. Every night, he makes a challenge for the title but instead of answering, Storm gets interrupted by another challenger who claims it's their time. This would be a great time to end Crimson's streak, I think. Push the PPV back and make Roode do this for 5 or 6 weeks. Each week another contender claiming the #1 spot is theirs and each week Sting, as the new authority figure, decides he wants to test Roode's mettle and lets it happen. Suddenly, the PPV is coming up and Roode is ready. The next week comes up and he tells Sting that he's played enough of the games and that he deserves a shot. And he appeals to Storm as his best friend. Then you put a non-title match on free TV for the fans as a warm up. Like sparring between friends. Knowing TNA, there'd be some sort of interference and ends in DQ but better yet, make it some accident. An accidental low blow or something on Roode at the end of a good 10 minute match.

    Roode gets upset and throws a fit but Storm apologizes and they talk it over. End the show on a hug. Then at Turning Point have a 30 minute match where Roode has done everything he can to put Storm down and it's just not working, Storm starts mounting an offense that seems like he's credibly going to be able to put Roode away with now that frustration and exhaustion have taken their toll and Roode smashes storm with the bottle and gets the pin.

    In this scenario you've given people a reason for Roode to hit his best friend in the head with a beer bottle, you've given people a preview match with an out for Roode to lose and a taste of things to come and a reason to buy the PPV. Which is what TNA should be working on. The thought that the big moments are the ones you want everyone in on is the reason people aren't buying TNA PPVs. You have no reason to. All of the big moments are already on TV.

  4. Many thanks for this article. I completely agree with you.

    Look on the bright side – Most of the people who work for Impact (especially Bischoff) wouldn't give two sh*&s about Meltzer or Alvarez, anyway.

  5. Even though it does seems like angles that actually happened a couple of months ago feel like they took place eons before that, let's not blow this out of proportion…Roode didn't start getting the push on television until right around and after No Surrender. Those vignettes didn't start until after he won the BFG series, but TNA knew all along that he, Gunner, or Crimson was going to win.

    So, in a way, it does feel rushed. The worst part is how they tipped their hand tonight about the impending schism of Beer Money…both guys came out to different music. I have to see how it plays out on screen, but the abrupt turn just seems drastic…couldn't we just get a program that started out as two friends vying for the title? You know, something along the lines of what RVD and Lynn were doing?

    Oh well, should be interesting to see if Fortune has a future, but Beer Money, RIP.

    And Dave Meltzer, you might be the biggest tool in wrestling, buddy. You stir up hackneyed rumors, then charge people to read about em. Retire already!

  6. Great column Eric. TNA has me curious also since Kurt Angle dropped the title to James Storm. I have not DVR'd Impact in almost 2 years, but now I am starting to feel the same way you are in a sense.

Leave a Reply to Autrach Sejanoz Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Popular